LLM Fine-Tuning, Compiling and Serving Optimization Benchmarks
This project takes Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct through six stages: distributed DPO fine-tuning (Ray Train vs. Horovod), two hand-written CUDA kernels, a three-way inference-engine benchmark (vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, ONNX Runtime GenAI), Triton Inference Server, and Kubernetes deployment with HPA, KEDA and Istio. Every performance number was measured live on a rented NVIDIA A40.
- 2.43x
- Fused CUDA kernel speedup
- 7.2x
- Throughput gap vs. ONNX Runtime GenAI
The challenge
The objective was to build and benchmark a complete, production-aligned LLM pipeline for Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct — from distributed DPO fine-tuning through hand-optimized CUDA kernels, inference-engine selection, serving and Kubernetes deployment — and to do it with measured, reproducible numbers rather than vendor claims. The work was carried out on a Mac without CUDA and an AWS GPU quota that stayed at zero, so real validation was done on a rented NVIDIA A40; every figure below is from that hardware, with unverified parts named explicitly.
Approach
- Built a single DPO training-step implementation shared by Ray Train and Horovod, then trained Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct end-to-end on Anthropic HH-RLHF with both backends — loss decreased, no NaNs, and the comparison isolates the distributed layer.
- Wrote two hand-optimized CUDA kernels — a fused RMSNorm + per-token INT8 quantization kernel and a vLLM-style KV-cache paging kernel — and verified them against pure-PyTorch oracles across hidden sizes 2048/3072 and fp16/bf16/fp32.
- Benchmarked vLLM, TensorRT-LLM and ONNX Runtime GenAI on identical A40 generation workloads at batch sizes 1 and 8, capturing throughput, TTFT and GPU memory together so the throughput-vs-footprint tradeoff is visible.
- Validated serving end-to-end: real Triton Inference Server round-trips with dynamic batching and Prometheus metrics on CPU, plus real Qwen2.5-3B completions through the engines' native serving CLIs on the GPU.
- Deployed the orchestration layer on Kubernetes with plain HPA, KEDA driven by Triton's pending-request metric, and Istio weighted canary routing — all verified under load on a local cluster.
- Kept the repo reproducible: Terraform for AWS/EKS, versioned configs, raw CSVs and captured command output linked to each run. Multi-GPU scaling, Nsight profiling and GPU-scheduled Kubernetes were not verified because of the AWS quota and RunPod capability limits.
Outcome
vLLM was selected for serving, delivering 534.8 tok/s at batch size 8 — 7.2x over ONNX Runtime GenAI and ahead of TensorRT-LLM — with a 32.7 ms TTFT. The fused CUDA kernel achieved a measured 2.37–2.43x speedup with 15/15 correctness tests passing. Kubernetes autoscaling and Istio canary routing were proven under real load, and the entire pipeline is ready to deploy to a GPU cluster once cloud quota is available.
Results in detail
Figures are from the delivered engagement, normalised where data is confidential.
Throughput by inference engine (real A40 measurements)
Output tokens/second on Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct at batch size 1 and 8, same GPU and prompt mix.
Time-to-first-token @ batch size 8
TTFT on Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct for the three inference engines, measured on the same A40 workload.
GPU memory footprint @ batch size 8
Reserved GPU memory for each engine — the paged KV-cache pool is what buys vLLM's throughput.
Custom CUDA kernel latency, baseline vs. optimized
Kernel duration via torch.cuda.Event. Fused RMSNorm+INT8 quant: 2.37x and 2.43x. KV-cache paging trades latency for memory efficiency.
Serving throughput under concurrency (native CLIs on GPU)
Real Qwen2.5-3B completions at concurrency 1 and 8 via vllm serve and trtllm-serve, after Docker proved unavailable on the rented pod.
Related projects
Fintech / Credit risk
Causal Auditing of RL Loan Pricing Policies Using Process Mining
Auditing a reinforcement-learning pricing agent for fairness and causal soundness with event-log mining.
E-commerce / Retail
Human-in-the-Loop E-Commerce AI Assistant
A shopping assistant that retrieves real catalogue data, defers to human agents, and learns from every handoff.
Automotive / Supply chain quality
Semantic Anomaly Detection & Classification for Supply Chain Operations
A hybrid deep-learning and classic-ML anomaly detection platform that flags supply-chain irregularities and recommends classification.